Chapter 4: Case Studies Related to Training of Arbiters
in Election Complaints
COMELEC is also endowed with the authority to take cognizance of “preproclamation controversies.” The substance of the vote count is not in issue in pre-proclamation controversies; the issues are limited to the validity
of the canvass procedure and the genuineness of election documents presented for canvass.29 Thus, as long as the canvass proceedings are done
in accordance with the prescribed procedures, and documents presented
for canvass appear ostensibly genuine and authentic, certification of the
results or proclamation of the winning candidate will follow as a matter of
course. The remedy for those who would allege fraud in the vote count
would only be a post-proclamation election protest.
Criminal violation of election laws is investigated and prosecuted by COMELEC and by the prosecutorial arm of the government.30 However, when probable cause is established that a respondent committed an election offense
after an investigation either by COMELEC or by government prosecutors,
the respondent is tried before second level courts (Regional Trial Courts) just
like in the criminal prosecution system.31
Candidate qualification complaints, political party registration issues, and
pre-proclamation controversies are within the administrative jurisdiction
of COMELEC to resolve.
D. Election Protests
As discussed in the introductory section, an election protest is a contest
between the defeated and the winning candidates on the grounds of fraud
and irregularities in the casting and counting of the ballots, or in the preparation of the returns.32 It raises the question of who actually obtained the
plurality of the legal votes and therefore is entitled to hold the office.33
In election protest, the proceedings are essentially judicial in character,
as distinguished from the administrative nature of the other proceedings
before COMELEC. Moreover, a proclaimed winner, notwithstanding the
pendency of the protest proceedings, is allowed to discharge the powers
Omnibus Election Code, B.P.Blg. 881, § 68 (1985) (Phil.).
An Act Amending the Election Modernization Act, Rep. Act 9369 § 42 (2007) (Phil.).
31
B.P.Blg. 881, § 268 (1985) (Phil.).
32
Samad v. COMELEC, 224 S.C.R.A. 631 (July 16, 1993) (Phil.).
33
Id.
29
30
185
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents