Previous 18 / 61 Next

location and operation hours of "satellite" offices. 09109120 Trial Tr. (Corson) at 4 c. 1 4:l 6-41 5 :5 ; 455 :13-456:2. Election Directive #01-2015, issued by the Montana Secretary ofState, directs each county with an American Indian reservation that includes voting-eligible residents to open satellite election offices on those reservations if required to protect the voting rights of tribal members under the Voting Rights Act (VRA). 09/09120 Trial Tr. (Corson) at 455:13-456:2. d. The State does not play a role in these negotiations and was not a party to the settlement agreemerrl it lyandering Medicine v. McCulloch, CV No. 12-135, BLG- DWM (D. Mont.), which requires the tribes and counties to work together to create satellite offices. Ex. 5028; Corson Deposition Designation (Corson Dep.) 73:4-:7, 77:19-22, 98:22-99:3 (Atg. e. 21 , 2020). Satellite election offices are provided in addition to the polling places on each reservation. Polling places are open on election day, and satellite offices are open on reservations during the early voting period. Tr. Trans. 515:1G-516:14 (Sept. 10, 2020); Ex. S031. f. Satellite offices provide in-person absentee voting and late registration services equivalent to the services at the main election office ofthe county. Agreed Fact 55. g. Individual Montana counties are directed to work with Tribal governments to open and staff satellite offices. For example, counties are supposed to work with and consult the Tribal govemment to arrive at a determination and mutual agreement of thelocationanddaysandtimesofoperationforeach"satellite"office.9lSl20Tial t8

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Western Native Voice v. Stapleton

Judgment

Question Presented: Whether the Ballot Interference Prevention Act violates the Plaintiff’s right to vote, right to free speech, right to association, and due process.

Alleged Acts: Montana presents unique challenges as the fourth largest state in terms of land size, but the third least densely populated. Consequently, most voters utilize the absentee voting procedure. Montana also is home to seven Reservations, intersecting with sixteen different counties. These Reservations each have unique challenges to voting including a lack of home mail delivery, transportation that does not run on a regular route, taking administrative leave to drive in groups to polling stations, limited mail routes and drop-off locations, lack of convenient P.O. boxes, and mail delays. Further, many Native American Reservations have difficulties traveling due to high poverty levels, lack of working vehicles, car insurance, licenses to drive off of reservations, or money for gasoline to travel to polling stations. Some Native Americans on Montana Reservations have voted through the collection and conveyance of their ballot to local election offices by community members and third parties.

Summary: The Defendants failed to provide evidence that the state of Montana has or ever had a problem with unsolicited ballot collection or ballot interference. Thus, because the Ballot Prevention Act interferes with fundamental rights it is required to meet strict scrutiny. The Ballot Interference Prevention Acts limits the number of ballots per collector to six ballots and the court determined that this did not meet a compelling state interests, lack basis, and the voter were uninformed of this limitation at the time of voting — ultimately failing a strict scrutiny test.

Conclusion: The court found in favor of the Plaintiffs stating that the Ballot Interference Prevention Action violated the right to free speech, right to vote, right to association, and right to due process.

Legal Issue(s)

Elections as a Fundamental Right
Indigenous Persons
Vote Verification and Transmission

Applicable Law(s): Ballot Inference Prevention Act

Region: Americas

Country: United States of America

Language of Decision

English

Court: Trial Court

Election Type: Review of law

Date of decision: Sep 25, 2020

Geolocation

Latitude: 46.55684320353664

Longitude: -112.0529752389978

: Geolocation

Primary Documents

Western Native Voice v. Stapleton.pdf
English
Download View

Election Judgments - IFES

Select target paragraph3

Western Native Voice v. Stapleton

Primary Documents

Notifications