129 affording him with an opportunity of showing cause. Mr. Attorney General submits that the change has been made due to the fact that under the Fourth Amendment the system of the government was changed and a presidential form of government was introduced, and therefore, the power of removal was given upon the President. I find fallacy in his submission. In any event, this provision for removal of Judges was changed in the Fifth Amendment providing a mechanism of Supreme Judicial Council and it has been retained in the learned Fifteenth Amendment. Attorney General Fifteenth Amendment the In this submits connection, that Parliament in would the have restored the original provision but as the amendment was made hastily, it was totally overlooked by the Law Minister. He further submitted that there was no discussion about retaining clauses (2) to (7) of article 96 in the Fifteenth Amendment, and therefore, it cannot be said that in the Fifteenth Amendment, the Supreme Judicial Council retained by the Parliament. mechanism has been