85 Latimar House Principles and held that the Judges are accountable to the constitution and the law; that the proper procedures for the removal of Judges on grounds of incapacity misbehaviour that are required to support the principles of independence of the judiciary – any such procedures should be fairly and objectively administered; that the Westminster system of Parliamentary removal has not proved to be most popular among Commonwealth jurisdictions; that ad-hoc tribunals and permanent disciplinary councils are akin to the Chief Justice – led Supreme Judicial Council; that the relationship between the Parliament and the judiciary should be governed by respect for the Parliament’s making on the primary one hand responsibility and for the for law- judiciary’s responsibility for the interpretation and application of law; that it leaves no room for doubt that the task of administration of justice is entrusted to the Judges who are unelected people and thus the Judges exercise sovereign judicial power of the people and by the authority of the constitution; that being the

Select target paragraph3