93 down new norms which would adequately deal with the new problems which arise in a highly industrialised economy.” I fully endorse the above view. In Anwar Hossain Chowdhury (supra), the importance of independence of judiciary was highlighted holding that the concept of independence of judiciary as part of the basic feature of the constitution, to secure rule of law, a lawyer is entitled Constitutional the to Amendment independence of challenge for the safeguarding judiciary. The High Court Division has assigned proper reasons in holding that the writ petitioners have locus standi to maintain the writ petition. I find no reason to depart from the same. The Supreme Court of India traveled to the extent that if the court takes cognizance of a PIL, it will not allow the petitioner to withdraw the petition on his free will. In Sheela Varsi V. Union of India, (1988) 4 SCC 266 and SP Anand V. HD Debugoura, (1996) 6 SCC 734, it was observed “In PIL