8 information provided by the political parties on their website; and (d) the respondent No.1 should direct the Commission to dispose of all applications under the RTI Act within the timeframe stipulated by the RTI Act (Annexure M). The said complaint was numbered as Complaint No.57 of 2014. In response thereto, the respondent No.1 issued a summons dated 01.07.2014 requiring the petitioner No.1 to attend a hearing on 16.07.2014 at 11.00 A.M at the office of the Information Commission, wherein the petitioner Nos.2, 3 and 4 were also present. After hearing the same on 16.07.2014, the respondent No.1 issued the impugned decision dated 16.07.2014 affirming its earlier decision/order dated 22.10.2013 in Complaint No.97/2013 (Annexure-N and N-1 respectively). In the circumstances, the petitioners had filed this application and obtained the instant Rule Nisi. The respondent No.1-Information Commission contested the case by filing an affidavit-in-opposition stating, inter-alia, that according to the provision of section 25 of the Right to Information Act, 2009 the Information Commission had disposed of the Complaint No. 57/2014 and thereby the petitioners have in no way been deprived of any legal right and hence, they are not entitled to get any remedy as prayed for. The respondent No.2-Election Commission also contested the case by filing a separate affidavit-in-opposition stating, inter-alia, that the information demanded by the petitioners from the Election Commission are not information of their own institution; rather those