Official Gazette – Issue No. 8 bis (a) May 26, 2013 9 Sixth: clause 7 of article (10) stipulates HEC's jurisdiction to set the rules on the distribution of the available time - particularly in the prime time - for TV and radio broadcast for electoral campaigning in the state and private media on absolutely equal basis. Whereas what is stated in the presented text on obliging private media to apply absolute equality in the electoral campaigning of all candidates contradicts the text of articles (45) and (48) of the constitution on ensuring the freedom of thought and opinion, freedom of press, publication and all mass media, since such entities are owned by persons of divergent ideological orientations, thus they may not be obliged to allocate equal times to show candidates' platforms which contradict with their orientations. This is not affected by the challenge that this obligation shall achieve equality among candidates; since ensuring such equality is the duty of the state and its formal media bodies according to articles (6), (8), (33) and (55) of the constitution. Seventh: clause 8 of article 10 vested HEC with announcing election and referendum general results. Whereas article (228) of the constitution stipulates that "The High Elections Commission, existing at the time the Constitution comes into effect, shall undertake full supervision of the first parliamentary elections", the entrustment of referendum general result to HEC stipulated in the aforementioned clause 8 infringes article (228) of the constitution. The same defect applies to paragraph 1 of article (33), the end of article (37), article (45), paragraph 1 of article (46) and (47) of the presented draft law. Eighth: paragraph 4 of article (12) of the draft law stipulates that "If the court – prior to the start of the polls – rules that the name of the candidate be expunged, the voting process shall proceed after excluding the candidate whose name was expunged. However, if the voting process starts before the court decides on the request, the polling process shall proceed provided that HEC suspends the announcement of the results of the elections in which the candidate in question is contesting in case he/she has received sufficient votes that allow them to win or to enter into a run-off vote against another candidate. In the event that the court rules that such candidate be removed, the election shall be re-run with the other candidates. Since the foregoing paragraph 4 omits facing the case in which the polling process starts before the High Administrative Court issues a ruling on expunging the name of a candidate, if the polling process does not result in his/her winning or entering into the re-run, and he got a number of votes that would affect the elections result within the constituency, so that if he/she is excluded from the candidates before the beginning of the poll, such votes or most of them would be distributed among the other candidates, affecting the result of who wins or stands for the re-run. Hence, such omission resulted in the infringement of the constitutional rights included in article (55) of the constitution as it affects the voter's right to choose and that is the essence of the right to election. Ninth: article (16) of the presented draft law stipulates that "Polling and vote counting processes for the Egyptians living abroad shall start before the scheduled

Select target paragraph3