Molka v. Poland
Document contents
life
(see Botta, cited above, § 34, and Zehnalová and Zehnal v. the Czech
Republic (dec.), no. 38621/97, ECHR 2002-V). The first of those cases
concerned
Judgment
Alajos Kiss v. Hungary
Document contents
May 1985, § 78, Series A no. 94, race
- D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 182, ECHR
2007-..., or sexual orientation -
Judgment
Election Dispute Resolution Report 2020
Document contents
Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus,
Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland
- Preview
Resources
Election Investigations Guidebook
Document contents
provisions in the
electoral laws of Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Moldova, Portugal, Serbia, Spain,
and the United
- Preview
Resources
Georgian Labour Party v. Georgia
Document contents
systems of electoral administration in
Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany,
Hungary, Italy, Moldova, Portugal, Serbia, Spain, Sweden and the
- Preview
Resources
Gorzelik v. Poland-
Document contents
passed over to Poland.
In the aftermath of the Munich Pact of 1938, most of Czech Silesia was
divided between Germany and Poland. After the German conquest of
Poland
- Preview
Resources
Tanase v. Moldova
Document contents
nationality, five prohibit it or allow it only in exceptional
circumstances (the Czech Republic, Denmark, Greece, Lithuania and
Poland) and six (Austria, Estonia, Germany,
- Preview
Resources
Equal Access: How to Include Persons with Disabilities in Elections and Political Processes
Document contents
May 1985, § 78, Series A no. 94, race - D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. § 182,
ECHR 2007‑..., or sexual orientation - E.B. v.
- Preview
Resources
Guide to Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights
Document contents
Partisi (the Welfare Party) and
Others v. Turkey [GC], 2003; Linkov v. the Czech Republic, 2006; Parti nationaliste basque –
Organisation régionale d’Iparralde v. France
- Preview
Resources
Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors, and Lawyers
Document contents
even more explicit with regard the
situation of trafficking in the Czech Republic, which gave rise to deep concern since the
State party was
- Preview
Resources
Yumak & Sadak v. Turkey
Document contents
are the most widely used in Europe.
By way of example, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Portugal,
- Preview
Resources
In re Magyar Ketfarku Kutya Part v. Hungary
Document contents
ban on such conduct.
42. In two of the member States surveyed (the Czech Republic and
Finland), the freedom of voters to publish information on their
- Preview
Resources
Sitaropoulos v. Greece
Document contents
into this category: Austria, Belgium,
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark,
Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Italy,
- Preview
Resources
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Document contents
5 et 7 de
l'article 14.
1 Translation supplied by the Government of Czech
oslovakia.
2 Traduction fournie par le Gouvernement tchécoslova
que.
Vol. 999,1-14668
- Preview
Resources
Measuring Effective Remedies for Fraud and Administrative Malpractice
Document contents
(2015),
http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/turkey/219201.
50 Id.
51 ID.
52 Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain and the United
- Preview
Resources
Electoral Justice Regulations Around the World: Key findings from International IDEA's global research on electoral dispute-resolution systems
Document contents
in this
aspect of the research show that in only two countries (the Czech
Republic and Eritrea) is there no legislation criminalizing any type
of misconduct
- Preview
Resources
17 shown of 17 entities