Majumdar v. Information Commission
Document contents
33
India including Indian National Congress/ All India Congress
Committee (AICC), Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and others, the
Central Information Commission of India,
Judgment
Bangladesh 16th amendment ruling
Document contents
General
the
of
Government
forwarded
to
India,
of
the
under
India
section
Act,1935.The
Federal
Court
of
India. Earlier, the procedure was to refer
Judgment
Advocate Prem Chandra Rai vs Government of Nepal
Document contents
by
the people. In this regard the Supreme Court of India in PUCL and ANR Vs. Union
of India and ANR
Machine Translated by Google
(2010)10 in the
Judgment
Lessons on the Use of Technology in Elections
Document contents
case Swamy v. Election Commission in India raised the question of whether the EVMs that had been
introduced in India met international standards for elections,
- Preview
Resources
Cybersecurity in Elections: Developing a Holistic Exposure and Adaptation Testing (HEAT) Process for Election Management Bodies
Document contents
change their vote on the
67
Swamy v. Election Commission of India (Supreme Court of India 2013).
Judgment of the Second Senate of March 3, 2009, 2
- Preview
Resources
Odinga v. IEBC
Document contents
Trivedi & Others103 and Union of India
v. Association for Democratic Reforms & Another104, the Supreme
Court of India, for example, stated that the word
Judgment
Preserving Electoral Integrity During an Infodemic
Document contents
April 28). India: Infections, Islamophobia, and Intensifying Societal Polarization.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/04/28/
india-infections-isla
- Preview
Resources
Scrutiny in Electoral Disputes: A Kenyan Judicial Perspective
Document contents
No. 24 of 2011, s. 6(1).
27 Countries such as the USA, Canada, Australia, India, and South Africa carry out scrutiny at various stages of their
respective electoral
- Preview
Resources
Mexico SUP JDC 304 2018
Document contents
Union of India and others (Writ Petition No. 400 of 2012 whit Writh No. 604 of 2013) donde la Suprema Corte de la India
conoció de
Judgment
Election Case Law Analysis Series: Lessons for Regulating Campaigning on Social Media
Document contents
for similar laws in at
least 13 other countries, including Venezuela, Vietnam, India, Russia, Malaysia, and Kenya, which have expanded
the scope of content from
- Preview
Resources
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Document contents
L'ISLANDE:
3a
POR ISLANDIA:
HANNES KJARTANSSON
30 Dec. 1968
FOR INDIA:
POUR L'INDE:
3a
POR LA INDIA:
FOR INDONESIA:
POUR L'INDONÉSIE:
3a
POR INDONESIA:
FOR IRAN:
- Preview
Resources
10- Perera v. Senarathe
Document contents
partnership has entered into a
contract dated 16. 11. 1995 on behalf of M/s Suz-Dent
(India) Pvt. Ltd. with the Ministiy of Health, Highways and
Social Services to supply
Judgment
Election Investigations Guidebook
Document contents
Shri Raj Narain
v. Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi case,
the Supreme Court of India also
emphasized the importance of
substantiated facts and evidence.134
In 1971,
- Preview
Resources
Legal Considerations when Delaying or Adapting Elections
Document contents
upholds SEC decision to postpone Andhra Pradesh Local Body Polls, Times of India (19 березня
2020 р., 1:58 PM), http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/74708189.cms?utm_source=conten
- Preview
Resources
Legal Considerations When Delaying or Adapting Elections
Document contents
the DRC has now done.
-18-
International Foundation for Electoral Systems
In India, the Supreme Court upheld the State Election Commission’s (SEC) decision to
- Preview
Resources
Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook
Document contents
of the President and Vice-president in India are heard directly by the
Supreme Court. Especially in Australia, Canada and India, independent and
autonomous EMBs have
- Preview
Resources
Access to Justice and Electoral Integrity: A policy brief of the Electoral Integrity Initiative
Document contents
3); in Afric: Botswana ($2.7) and Kenya ($1.8); in
Asia and the Pacific: India ($1), Pakistan ($0.5), and Australia ($3.2).33
25
Access to Justice and Electoral
- Preview
Resources
An Integrated Approach to Election and Conflict
Document contents
political or religious
cleavages that may be aggravated by elections (e.g., Kenya, India, Guyana and Kyrgyzstan). There may be
insurgent groups that threaten the integrity
- Preview
Resources
Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors, and Lawyers
Document contents
domestic case law II:
The example of India
The right to life in article 21 of the Constitution of India was given an
extensive interpretation
- Preview
Resources
Budding Democracy or Judicialisation: Lessons from Africa’s Emerging Electoral Jurisprudence
Document contents
seem to consistently rely
on the views of the Supreme Court of India such
Shri Kirpal Singh v Shri v Giri.79 The Indian Supreme
Court
- Preview
Resources
Bench Book on Electoral Dispute Resolution
Document contents
‘The Supreme Court of India re-defines admissibility of electronic
evidence in India’).
4.8.3.1.7
The Supreme Court of India further noted that owing
- Preview
Resources
Wong Souk Yee v. Attorney General
Document contents
structure doctrine laid down in the seminal
decision of the Supreme Court of India in Kesavananda Bharati v State of
Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461 forms part
Judgment
Antonio Pedro de Siqueira Indio da Costa v. Public Electoral Ministry (No. 1825-24.2010.6.00.0000)
Document contents
Relator para o acórdão: Ministro Marcelo Ribeiro
Recorrente: Antonio Pedro de Siqueira Índio da Costa
Advogados: Arnaldo Malheiros e outros
Recorrido: Ministério Público Eleitoral
RECURSO
Judgment
Guide Electoral, Tome III Référencement jurisprudentiel 2006-2018
Document contents
nationale indépendante de déclarer recevable la candidature de Monsieur KAMA INDI Augustin et de recevoir une nouvelle
déclaration de candidature rectifiée de
- Preview
Resources
Ali v. David
Document contents
30(2), (4) and (8).
53
See Narayan Khare v The Election Commission of India [1957] INSC 43,AIR 1957 SC 694, (1957) SCR 1081; NP Ponnuswami v
Returning
- Preview
Resources
Electoral Justice Regulations Around the World: Key findings from International IDEA's global research on electoral dispute-resolution systems
Document contents
disqualification of a candidate for
a certain period of time, as practiced in India, Mozambique, Nepal and
Pakistan; and de-registration of a political party in
- Preview
Resources