Search Tips
sorted by
19 shown of 19 entities
Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij v. the Netherlands
Procedural history
The Netherlands appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal of the Hague in December 2007.
- Question Presented
- Whether religiously affiliated parties can exclude women from running as candidates on the grounds that forcing the party to host women candidates violates its freedom of religious expression, as it believes women are unsuited for public office?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Gender
- Country
- Netherlands
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Jul 10, 2012
Judgment
Wendenberg v. Netherlands
- Question Presented
- Whether an electoral bribe must be for the amount promised in order to be a criminal offense.
- Legal Issue(s)
- Criminal Procedure
- Electoral Integrity
- Country
- Netherlands
- Language of Decision
- Dutch
- Date of decision
- Apr 9, 2019
Judgment
Election Dispute Resolution Report 2020
Document contents
Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia,
Switzerland (shared with the Supreme Federal Tribunal).
66 Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Norway.
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Election Dispute Resolution
- Legal Frameworks
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Language
- English
Resources
Chester v. Secretary of State for Justice
Document contents
Parliamentary elections upon Dutch nationals residing in the
Netherlands or abroad except in Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles. After
repeating (para 45) that “in the
- Legal Issue(s)
- Judicial Independence
- Voter Registration
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Oct 16, 2013
Judgment
Sitaropoulos v. Greece
Document contents
Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Republic of Moldova,
Monaco, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia,
Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Election Accessibility
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Language
- English
Resources
Guide to Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights
Document contents
alleviating the bloody conflict.
39. The case of Sevinger and Eman v. the Netherlands (dec.), 2007, concerned the inability of the
residents of the island of
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Legal Frameworks
- Language
- English
Resources
Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors, and Lawyers
Document contents
the Netherlands, judgment of 26 August 1997, Reports 1997-IV, p. 1379 ff.
81 Eur. Court HR, Case of de Haan v. the Netherlands, judgment
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Election Dispute Resolution
- Language
- English
- Portuguese
Resources
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Document contents
MARRUECOS:
FOR NEPAL:
POUR LE N PAL:
3a Henaji:
POR NEPAL:
FOR THE NETHERLANDS :
POUR LES PAYS-BAS:
3a
POR LOS PA!SES BAJOS:
D. G. E. MlDDELBURG
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- International Treaty
- Language
- English
Resources
Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook
Document contents
as in the United States,
Italy, Latvia and Lithuania but not Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and
Switzerland; or (b) subsequent judicial review of decisions by
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Election Dispute Resolution
- Language
- English
Resources
Zdanoka v. Latvia
Document contents
Commission found that it did not. Thus, in the
cases of X v. the Netherlands (no. 6573/74, Commission decision of
19 December 1974, DR 1, p. 87) and
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Violation of an International Treaty
- Language
- English
Resources
Incal v. Turkey
Document contents
Article 10 (see, among
other authorities, the Vereniging Weekblad Bluf! v. the Netherlands
judgment of 9 February 1995, Series A no. 306-A, p. 16, §§ 45 and
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Violation of an International Treaty
- Language
- English
Resources
Measuring Effective Remedies for Fraud and Administrative Malpractice
Document contents
51 ID.
52 Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain and the United
Kingdom.
53 John Barnes, The right to
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Electoral Fraud
- Language
- English
Resources
Obradovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Document contents
in certain specific cases (see Eur. Court HR, Engel and Others v. The Netherlands,
judgement of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, pp. 33-36, paragraphs 80-85)
- Question Presented
- Whether the plaintiff's dismissal from the military banned him from participating in the General Election?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Candidate Registration
- Country
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Oct 10, 2003
Judgment
Yumak & Sadak v. Turkey
Document contents
the centrist and
Christian parties in Scandinavia, the Greens in the Netherlands and the
centre-left and the right in Italy. In most countries which had
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Legal Frameworks
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Language
- English
- French
Resources
Tanase v. Moldova
Document contents
Greece, Lithuania and
Poland) and six (Austria, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, the Netherlands and
Spain) allow it in certain circumstances, to varying extents. Two States
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Election Accessibility
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Violation of an International Treaty
- Language
- English
Resources
Communist Party of Russia v. Russia
Document contents
not a court of appeal from the national courts (see
Cornelis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 994/03, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)),
and it is not its function
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Violation of an International Treaty
- Language
- English
Resources
Odinga v. IEBC
Document contents
jurisdictions, notably
Australia; New Zealand; Canada; the United Kingdom; Ireland; the
Netherlands; India and South Africa, also makes a clear distinction between
Presidential
- Question Presented
- Which party has the burden of proof to contest an election?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Disputing Results
- Electoral Integrity
- Country
- Kenya
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Sep 1, 2017
Judgment
Bush v. Gore
Document contents
for State Prisoners, 76 Harv. L. Rev. 441, 509
(1963)); see O’Dell v. Netherland, 521 U. S. 151, 156 (1997)
(“[T]he Teague doctrine validates reasonable,
- Question Presented
- Did the Florida Supreme Court violate Article II Section 1 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution by making new election law? Do standardless manual recounts violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Constitution?
- Legal Issue(s)
- Disputing Results
- Vote Verification and Transmission
- Country
- United States of America
- Language of Decision
- English
- Date of decision
- Dec 12, 2000
Judgment
Georgian Labour Party v. Georgia
Document contents
examined the
systems of voter registration in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Italy, the
Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom.
55. With the exception of Portugal
- Preview
- Loading
- Legal Issue and/or Topic
- Electoral Fraud
- Regional Jurisprudence
- Violation of an International Treaty
- Language
- English
Resources
19 shown of 19 entities