Jampen v. State Council
Country
Switzerland
Judgment
K., B., & S. v. Government Council
Country
Switzerland
Judgment
Election Dispute Resolution Report 2020
Document contents
Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, San Marino, Slovak Republic, Slovenia,
Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom.
43 Armenia, Brazil, Ireland, Kosovo, Ukraine, Tunisia.
- Preview
Resources
Sitaropoulos v. Greece
Document contents
several established democracies in western
Europe, e.g. Germany, Ireland, Spain, Switzerland ... It was also used, for example, in
Bosnia and Herzegovina and the
- Preview
Resources
Grosaru v. Romania
Document contents
parliamentary landscape. It may also be useful
to point out that in 2005, Switzerland created the possibility of an appeal to
the Federal Court (while previously
- Preview
Resources
Lessons on Disinformation and Election Disputes
Document contents
constitutes manipulated
information, the Council upheld the law as constitutional.
In Switzerland, the legal framework does not provide for strict
regulations relating to
- Preview
Resources
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Document contents
SWEDEN:
POUR LA SUÈDE:
3a
POR SUEOA:
TORSTEN NlLSSON
29 September 1967
FOR SWITZERLAND:
POUR LA SDBSE:
3a
POR SUIZA:
VoL 999,1-14668
1976
United Nations —
- Preview
Resources
In re Magyar Ketfarku Kutya Part v. Hungary
Document contents
PÁRT v. HUNGARY JUDGMENT
35
§ 31, Series A no. 298, and Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 58,
29 March 2016). The MKKP’s conduct falls into
- Preview
Resources
An Integrated Approach to Election and Conflict
Document contents
those programs at the Department of Peace and Conflict
Research at Uppsala University, Switzerland (http://www2.pcr.uu.se/index.htm) and the United States Institute for Peace (USIP). USIP
also
- Preview
Resources
Access to Justice and Electoral Integrity: A policy brief of the Electoral Integrity Initiative
Document contents
ongoing project visit
elections.kofiannanfoundation.org
P.O.B. 157 | 1211 Geneva 20 | Switzerland
Tel: +41 22 919 7520
Fax: +41 22 919 7529
Email: info@kofiannanfoundation.org
- Preview
Resources
Advocate Prem Chandra Rai vs Government of Nepal
Document contents
to the home country through post. Countries like Canada, Norway,
Mexico, and Switzerland seem to be using this method. The third method
of giving citizens abroad
Judgment
Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors, and Lawyers
Document contents
practical and effective.”76
The case of S. v. Switzerland
In the case of S. v. Switzerland, the applicant complained of a violation of article
- Preview
Resources
Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook
Document contents
Italy, Latvia and Lithuania but not Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and
Switzerland; or (b) subsequent judicial review of decisions by parliament
on legislative
- Preview
Resources
Iskra v. Russia
Document contents
21132/05, § 72, ECHR 2008 (extracts), and VgT Verein
gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no. 24699/94, § 75, ECHR 2001-VI).
104. It follows from the constitutional
- Preview
Resources
Tanase v. Moldova
Document contents
other relevant instruments of
international law (for example, Emonet and Others v. Switzerland,
no. 39051/03, § 65, 13 December 2007, and Al-Adsani v. the United
- Preview
Resources
Labita v. Italy
Document contents
of respect for individual liberty (see, among other
authorities, the W. v. Switzerland judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A
no. 254-A, p. 15, § 30).
It
- Preview
Resources
Chester v. Secretary of State for Justice
Document contents
least 18 European countries including Denmark,
Finland, Ireland, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland have no restrictions on voting by
prisoners. Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary,
Judgment
Equal Access: How to Include Persons with Disabilities in Elections and Political Processes
Document contents
International USA
• Stefan Tromel – Executive Director, International Disability Alliance, Switzerland-based
• Yusdiana – Senior Disability Rights Adviser, Indonesia Disabled People’s Association
- Preview
Resources
Gandhi v. Narain
Document contents
which had not confronted other
federations like America, Australia, Candada or Switzerland. These problems
had to be solved pragmatically and not by confining
Judgment
19 shown of 19 entities