Election Dispute Resolution Report 2020
Document contents
partially Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia,
Switzerland (shared with the Supreme Federal Tribunal).
66 Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands
- Preview
Resources
Sitaropoulos v. Greece
Document contents
France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Italy,
Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Republic of Moldova,
Monaco, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania
- Preview
Resources
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Document contents
270
FOR LIECHTENSTEIN:
POUR LE LIECHTENSTEIN:
3a
POR LIECHTENSTEIN:
FOR LUXEMBOURG:
POUR LE LUXEMBOURG:
&&&'•
3a JIioKceMÔypr:
POR LUXEMBURGO:
JEAN RETTEL
Le 26 novembre
- Preview
Resources
Grosaru v. Romania
Document contents
powers by the
legislative chamber are in western Europe (Belgium, Italy and
Luxembourg). The tendency towards investing courts with jurisdiction for
post-electoral disputes
- Preview
Resources
Yumak & Sadak v. Turkey
Document contents
By way of example, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Portugal,
Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Turkey
- Preview
Resources
Chester v. Secretary of State for Justice
Document contents
manner
advocated by Mr O’Neill and Mr Southey. In both Strasbourg and Luxembourg
case-law, discrimination issues are customarily described as involving a two-stage
Judgment
Manuel de Capitalisation des Bonnes Pratiques en Matière de Contentieux Électoral dans l'Espace Francophone
Document contents
Grèce • Guinée • Guinée-Bissau • Guinée équatoriale • Haïti • Laos • Liban • Luxembourg •
Madagascar • Mali • Maroc • Maurice • Mauritanie • Moldavie • Principauté
- Preview
Resources
8 shown of 8 entities