2 _____________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT _____________________________________________________________________ WEPENER J (MBHA JA, LAMONT J and MS PATHER (MEMBER), CONCURRING [1] On Tuesday 29 April 2019 this court issued the following order and reasons therefor: ‘[1] The Chief Electoral Officer of the Commission is obliged to publish his or her decision in terms of section 15(5) of the Electoral Commission Act 51 of 1996 as soon as reasonably practicable after the decision has been taken. [2] There was a failure to publish the registration of the Second Respondent in the Government Gazette. In consequence, the period of thirty days referred to in section 16(2) of the Electoral Commission Act 51 of 1996, did not commence. Order [1] The decision of the Electoral Commission to refuse condonation to the applicant and the consequent dismissal of the appeal, is reviewed and set aside. [2] [2] There is no order as to costs.’ The applicant in the matter is the Freedom Front Plus, a registered political party which has seats both in the national and provincial legislators. The first respondent is the Electoral Commission (the Commission), a body established pursuant to chapter 9 of the Constitution and which conducts itself in terms of the Electoral Commission Act1 (the Act). The second respondent is Black First Land First (the BLF), a political party, registered as such by officials of the first respondent. [3] On 30 April 2019 the Commission requested reasons for the Court’s decision aforesaid. These were set out shortly when the court issued its decision. I now elaborate on the reasons and findings as published on 29 April 2019. 1 Act 51 of 1996.

Select target paragraph3