57 your Honor that these regulations were contained in our file from 2005, 2011 and 2014. This is to say that the addition to the roll is not the making of this current board." 7. 1st Appellants say and aver that the Board of Commissioners (BOC) committed a reversible error when the BOC, in its Final Ruling, failed to take into consideration another portion of the Appellee's witness Lighe's testimony. He testified that, "The staff themselves were overwhelmed. That was also supported by the fact that our staff was also challenged. Prior to the conduct of these elections the Commission taking clue from the election voters registration, were staff hired by the Commission in carrying out the function. We wrote other stake holders requesting assisting from professional Liberians. ... Unfortunately, we got response from only the Angie Brooks Randolph Institute and, as the result of political manipulation, there were rumors being spread wide and far that Chairman Kokoya had intended to fraud the process by bringing in presiding officers. And in order to satisfy those doubts, about three hundred names that were submitted were withdrawn. So basically, we went to the polls with those Liberians who were available. Those Liberians who were not the most qualified but who availed themselves to partake in the October 10 election. Monitoring reports and even our own observation clearly states that staff at our centers were challenged. They had difficulties in directing voters to their assigned rooms; they had difficulties in finding names on the final voter rolls in their polling stations. As a result of that, this caused uncomfortable situation with some voters. This led voters to be weary. These causes brought about congestion and delayed." 8. 1st Appellants say and aver that the Board of Commissioners (BOC) committed a reversible error when the BOC, in its Final Ruling, failed to take in consideration that although, "the fact that a voter's particulars did not appear on the FRR will not be ground to invalidate any document or results concerning the October 10, 2017 elections," it certainly deprived such voter of his/her constitutional right to vote, making the entire elections a sham, and should therefore be rerun, and the 1st Appellants so pray. A case in point is Debora Harris of Grand Bassa County, who testified that on election day she was a poll watcher for Liberty Party. When she went to vote she was told that her name was not on the FRR. She testified that she went from Polling Place to Polling Place, but was without success in finding her name on the FRR, so she and many others like her, as she testified, did not get to vote. Her testimony remained unrefuted by the Defendant. 9. 1st Appellants say and aver that the Board of Commissioners (BOC) committed a reversible error when the BOC, in its Final Ruling, failed to take into consideration Section 3.2 of the enabling Regulation on Polling and Counting, which provides that, "If a person has a valid Registration Card marked for a precinct, but whose name cannot be found on the voter registration roll for the precinct, subject to paragraph 3, the presiding officer shall permit the person to vote, if the person's Registration Card is verified through the SMS verification system managed by the NEC." Also, allowing individuals carrying "valid Registration Card," whose names are not found in the Voter Registration Roll, is subject to two conditions: (i) the