Civil Appeal No.188 of 2019 . 6 seeks not the rejection of a nomination paper but the voiding of an election. Under Section 156 of the Election Act, 2017 (“the Act”), an election can only be declared void if the nomination of the Returned Candidate was invalid or procured or induced by any corrupt or illegal practice. He maintains that there is a higher test than that prescribed for rejection of a nomination paper and mere incorrectness in any of the particulars is not sufficient to void the election. The learned ASC maintains that in order to void an election it must be shown that mis-statement in the nomination form is of a kind to justify an inference of corrupt practice. It must be established that the candidate intentionally made a false statement/declaration or if a statement was made in the circumstances so as to rule out the likelihood of a bona fide error. He relies on Muhammad Hanif Abbasi v. Imran Khan Niazi (PLD 2018 SC 189), Shakeel Awan v. Rasheed Ahmed (PLD 2018 SC 643) and Muhammad Asif v. Muhammad Usman Dar (2018 SCMR 2128). He finally submits that the ratio of the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the Appellant in support of his contentions is not attracted to the facts and circumstances of the present case. 5. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and examined the available record with their assistance. At the very outset, we have noticed that Respondent No.1 did not disclose his entire landholding in Deh Khedkar, District Larkana which admittedly consists of 140.24½ acres. Out of the said holding he only declared 61 acres but did not