Civil Appeal No.188 of 2019 7 . disclose the rest which according to him had been transferred in his name by way of a family settlement agreement executed in 2014. He also admits that the holdings of his minor sons were also not disclosed in the relevant documents. Respondent No.1 attempted to explain away his failure to disclose the said assets by stating that after the demise of his paternal grandmother, the land that stood in her name was distributed amongst her legal heirs i.e. Munawar Ali Abbasi and others. At that point in time, a family settlement with regard to the entire land was entered into. In consequence, Respondent No.1 and his minor sons received substantial land. This was duly transferred in their respective names. It was further submitted that only that part of the land was disclosed in the nomination papers and other related documents which had been transferred and was in the possession of Respondent No.1. The rest was not disclosed because it was under the control and supervision of his father who was allegedly the real beneficiary of the said land. He was supervising and overseeing its cultivation and also paying land revenue on the same. This situation had allegedly existed since the private partition dated 17.10.2014. Admittedly, the family partition was duly implemented in all revenue records and the respective shares of all beneficiaries of the family partition were duly reflected in all requisite records as owners. 6. On the basis of facts and circumstances narrated hereinabove and in view of the admission on the part of

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents