7/17/2020 CACV73/2020 JUNIOR POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION OF THE HONG KONG POLICE FORCE AND ANOTHER v. ELECTORAL … Mr Paul Shieh SC, Mr Robert Pang SC and Ms Natalie So, instructed by L & L Lawyers, for the intervener [1] See [48] to [53] and [56] of the Judgment. [2] See [57] to [60] of the Judgment. [3] At [4] to [7] of the CA judgment. [4] At [26] to [28] of the Judgment. [5] See also [20] of the CA Judgment which referred to the grant of interim injunction against doxxing in favour of newspaper and news reporters. [6] Such practices were described at [18] of the CA Judgment. [7] Discussed by the Judge at [49] to [53] of the Judgment. [8] See [70] to [72] of the Judgment. He cited the judgment of the English Divisional Court in Corporate Officer of the House of Common v The Information Commissioner [2008] EWHC 1084 (Admin) in support. That case was decided in the context of ordinary circumstances (see [38] of that judgment) when the relevant rules had provision for exception for special security reason, see [35]). The Divisional Court also added at the end of the judgment at [44] that were there be change of circumstances, the issues of privacy might lead to a different conclusion. [9] See [75] of the Judgment. [10] See Judgment [74] and [84(6)]. [11] See [89(3)] of the Judgment. The relevant overseas regimes are summarized in a table at Appeal Bundle B(1) p. 146 to 147. As noted by the Judge, there are jurisdictions where public inspection of electoral registers is, like our present system, unrestricted. [12] See [77] to [80] of the Judgment. https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=128057&QS=%2B&TP=JU&ILAN=en 38/39