33 requirements for the registration of a political party, such as the need to include regional representation, are necessary to avoid tribalism. 90.2 Regarding the alleged discrimination, the Respondent argues that the relevant constitutional amendments were not targeted at any particular individuals, but apply to all Tanzanians equally; therefore the amendments are not discriminatory. 90.3 With regard to the alleged violation of the right to freedom of association, the Respondent argues that standing for a political position is a matter of personal ambition; one is not forced to do so if one does not want to. Referring to 2nd Applicant in particular, Respondent argues that he has never been prevented from participating in politics; he belongs to a political party and has stood for the position of President but lost. 90.4 The Respondent therefore prays the Court to dismiss the applications. The Decision of The Court On The Merits. The right to participate freely in the government of one’s country 91. The Applicants, as stated earlier, contend that the Respondent is in violation of article 13 (1) of the Charter. They argue that the violation is still continuing as it pertains to constitutional and statutory provisions which are still in force.