consideration should be given to requiring institutions to make all documents in their possession available to the public within reasonable periods of time. This ties in with the finding of the legal review that it would be beneficial to develop binding guidelines for local electoral commissions, patterned after best regional or global practices, to enumerate all documents that would have to be published (such as primary and secondary legislation, decisions, activity calendars, electoral lists, summaries of meeting transcripts, election results and the like) and the time limits for doing so, and in particular emphasizing the need for regular publication of objections filed and rulings made in response to them. 3.2.5. Compliance of the Serbian EDR process with international principles: conclusion For clarity, the findings showing the extent of compliance with international principles discussed in the foregoing sections are summarized in the Table below. Table 3.2.5.1. Compliance of the Serbian electoral dispute resolution process with international principles Principle Score* Key strength Key weakness Fairness 2 Broad-based, adequate right to file objections; awareness of proceedings Political character and composition of authorities and lack of appropriate fact-finding Efficiency 3 Efficient adjudication of objections and disputes without undue delay Short time limits for adjudicating objections and disputes 3 Broad-based, adequate right to file objections and lodge appeals / seek judicial review; availability of duly justified decisions Inadequate application of remedies / inadequate legal regulation 2 Public availability of decisions/rulings adopted by the REC and the Administrative Court Inability to access all information in real time; lack of transparency of local bodies Effectiveness Transparency * Compliance score on a scale from 1 to 4, where 1 meant ‘not at all’, 2 meant ‘mostly no’, 3 meant ‘mostly yes’, and 4 meant ‘completely yes’ 19