street/square. As stated above, by their nature, these activities are not unauthorized unless they imply illegally obtained data, misuse of administrative resources or contacting those citizens who do not agree with it or have not given their consent. The lowest percentage of citizens claiming to have been exposed to such activities once or more during the 2020 parliamentary elections is found in the case of party activists visiting the workplace – 2.7 %. This was followed by visits by party activists in the house/apartment, experienced by eight times more respondents – 22.1% and then a stop by party activists on the street, confirmed by 26.5% of the respondents. The largest number of citizens experienced telephone calls before or during the election day with a push to vote – 27.2 %, or telephone calls from a political party that participated in the election process – 34.1 %. Chart 4.3.10.1.1 during the June elections, were you… (in %) 97 77.3 73.5 72.5 63.3 17.7 7.7 8.7 13.5 2.6 Telephoned by a political party that participated in the election? 14.2 5.6 3 0 Visited by party political activists at home No, never Yes, but rarely 1.6 0.6 0.5 0.2 Visited by party political activists at your workplace Yes, frequently 16.4 8.1 4.2 Canvassed by party political activists in a public street or square Yes, regularly 4.2 6.6 0 0.3 Telephoned prior or on election day to insist you turned out at the polling station and gave your support DNK, Cannot tell Chart 4.3.10.1.2. During the June elections, were you… (the answers are presented in summary, but rarely + yes, often + yes, regularly) in % 34.1 27.2 26.5 22.1 2.7 Telephoned by a political party that participated in the election Telephoned prior or on Canvassed by party Visited by party political Visited by party political election day to insist you political activists in a activists at home activists at your turned out at the polling public street or square workplace station and gave your support 71