Previous 6 / 6 Next

Maxwel Ochieng’ & another v Orange Democratic Movement [2017] eKLR b) That the 1st Respondent be and is hereby restrained from issuing the final nomination certificate to any other person for the position of the Member of County Assembly, Korogocho Ward, Ruaraka Constituency, Nairobi County. c) That, in the event that the 1st Respondent has issued the final nomination certificate to the 2nd Respondent or any another individual for the position of the Member of County Assembly, Korogocho Ward, Ruaraka Constituency, Nairobi County, the same is hereby declared null and void. d) That the 1st Respondent be and is hereby ordered to conduct fresh nominations for the position of the Member of County Assembly, Korogocho Ward, Ruaraka Constituency, Nairobi County within 24 hours of this judgment. e) That this judgment be and is hereby applied mutatis mutandis to Complaint Number 235 of 2017. f) No orders as to cost in order to foster party unity, growth and democracy. Orders accordingly. DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY 2017 Kyalo Mbobu ....................................................................... (Chairman) James Atema ……................................................................. (Member) Hassan Abdi .......................................................................... (Member) Page 6 of 6

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Ochieng' v. Orange Democratic Movement

Judgment

Question Presented: Was the respondent's nomination free, fair, and credible? Should the election be annulled when the respondents locked themselves in a room with the ballot boxes and papers, preventing the petitioner from entering?

Alleged Acts: The respondents refused to allow for transportation of ballot boxes and papers and locked themselves in a room before declaring themselves winners.

Procedural history: The petitioner lodged a complaint with the County Appeals Tribunal, which revoked the respondent's nomination certificate in favor of the petitioner. However, the respondent ignored the Court and issued a final nomination certificate for the respondent. The petitioner appealed to this Court asking for an order that he won the election, and an order restraining the respondents. The respondents in their response argued the County Appeals Tribunal did not have jurisdiction.

Summary: Ochieng was a candidate for Member of County Assembly, Korogocho Ward, Ruaraka Constituency, Nairobi County. ODM prevented Ochieng from entering the room with the ballot boxes and papers. The Tribunal held this to render the election process opaque, unaccountable, and inaccurate rather than free, fair, and credible. The Tribunal prevented ODM from issuing the nomination certificate to anyone else and ordered new nominations.

Conclusion: The Tribunal declared the fraudulent nomination null and void and ordered ODM to conduct new nominations for the Member of County Assembly position.

Legal Issue(s)

Disputing Results
Electoral Integrity
Vote Form Irregularities

Applicable Law(s): Constitution- Articles 38, 91(1)(d) Political Parties Act- Section 9

Region: Africa

Country: Kenya

Language of Decision

English

Court: Trial Court

Election Type: Local

Date of decision: May 14, 2017

Geolocation

Latitude: -1.299737311

Longitude: 36.80159856

: Geolocation

Primary Documents

Maxwel and Another v. Orange Democratic Movement.pdf
English
Download View

Election Judgments - IFES

Select target paragraph3

Ochieng' v. Orange Democratic Movement

Primary Documents

Notifications