Published on The Estonian Supreme Court (https://www.riigikohus.ee) Home > Constitutional judgment 3-4-1-6-11 Constitutional judgment 3-4-1-6-11 RULING OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW CHAMBER OF THE SUPREME COURT No. of case 3-4-1-6-11 Date of judgment 23 March 2011 Composition of court Chairman Märt Rask and members Jüri Põld and Harri Salmann Court Case Complaint of Henn Põlluaas for annulment of electronic votes cast in the Riigikogu elections 2011. Hearing Written proceeding DECISION To return the complaint of Henn Põlluaas without review. FACTS, COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS AND JUSTIFICATIONS OF THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROCEEDING 1. Henn Põlluaas filed a complaint to the National Electoral Committee on 9 March 2011 requesting annulment of the e-voting results because during the e-elections, not every voter in the polling division no. 3 (Mustamäe and Nõmme) had the possibility to vote in favour of him, i.e. the independent candidate Henn Põlluaas (no. 887). 2. According to the complaint of H. Põlluaas, Aivar Silma informed him and the National Electoral Committee on 25 February 2011 of problems regarding the e-voting. The National Electoral Committee said that it is an isolated incident and that there is nothing they can do about it. The fault was not rectified by the end of the e-elections. 3. Pursuant to the complaint, the National Electoral Committee admitted in the letter of 2 March 2011 that the programme used in elections encounters an error when using some of the resolutions and fonts of the

Select target paragraph3