10 respondent who has not furnished as address for service, then as required by rule 78 of these Rules, his or her last known address and proof of service on him or her of the notice of appeal; (c) The pleadings; (d) the trial judge’s notes of the hearing; (e) the transcript of any shorthand notes taken or any other notes howsoever recorded at the trial; (f) the affidavits read and all documents put in evidence at the hearing, or if those documents are not in English language, certified translations of them; (g) the judgment or reasoned order; (h) the order, if any, giving leave to appeal, (i) the notice of appeal; and (j) any other documents necessary for the proper determination of the appeal, including any interlocutory proceedings which may be directly relevant.” The provisions of this rule give guide lines of what ought to be included in a 20 record of appeal. The record is not supposed to include each and everything. What is important is for the record of appeal to contain sufficient material to enable the appellate court to determine the appeal. The record of appeal before us, I think contains material witness evidence and documents to enable this court to determine the appeal. Moreover the record has a certificate of correctness by the Registrar. Iam unable to find that the appellant suffered any injustice. This issue ought to fail. On evaluation of evidence, I think there is some merit in this issue. The trial judge adopted an omnibus evaluation of all the evidence especially allegations 30 of bribery thus coming to the wrong conclusion that the allegations were not proved. She relied on two decisions –Dr Kiiza Besigye v Museveni Yoweri 25