Previous 1 / 15 Next

JUICIO PARA LA PROTECCIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS POLÍTICO-ELECTORALES DEL CIUDADANO EXPEDIENTE: SM-JDC-167/2021 PARTE ACTORA: MARTÍNEZ MANUEL PACHECO RESPONSABLE: TRIBUNAL ELECTORAL DEL ESTADO DE COAHUILA DE ZARAGOZA MAGISTRADA PONENTE: CLAUDIA VALLE AGUILASOCHO SECRETARIA: MARÍA GUADALUPE VÁZQUEZ OROZCO Monterrey, Nuevo León, a treinta y uno de marzo de dos mil veintiuno. Sentencia definitiva que confirma la resolución dictada por el Tribunal Electoral del Estado de Coahuila de Zaragoza en los recursos de queja TECZRQ-2/2021 y TECZ-RQ-3/2021 acumulados, al considerarse ineficaces los agravios hechos valer, toda vez que no controvierten frontalmente las razones brindadas en la decisión que se revisa, esto es, se sustentan en el planteamiento inicial de la omisión del Instituto Electoral de esa entidad de establecer una cuota específica como acción afirmativa que garantice el acceso de personas integrantes de la comunidad LGBTTTIQ+1 en la postulación de candidaturas a ayuntamientos, lo cual no procede jurídicamente analizar, ya que existió una negativa expresa de la autoridad administrativa de implementarlas en el proceso electoral local en curso, la cual adquirió definitividad y firmeza por no impugnarse en su oportunidad. ÍNDICE G L O S A R I O ........................................................................................................................... 2 1. ANTECEDENTES DEL CASO ............................................................................................ 2 2. COMPETENCIA .................................................................................................................. 4 3. PROCEDENCIA .................................................................................................................. 4 4. ESTUDIO DE FONDO ......................................................................................................... 4 4.1. Materia de la controversia ......................................................................................... 4 4.1.1. Sentencia impugnada ....................................................................................... 4 4.1.2. Planteamiento ante esta Sala ........................................................................... 5 4.2. Cuestión a resolver ................................................................................................... 6 4.3. Decisión .................................................................................................................... 6 4.4. Caso concreto ........................................................................................................... 6 4.4.1. El trámite del escrito de impugnación local como recurso de queja no le causa perjuicio a la parte actora, pues se garantizó su derecho de acceso a la justicia ............. 6 4.4.2. Son ineficaces los agravios hechos valer, por no controvertirse frontalmente las razones de la sentencia y sustentarse en la omisión del IEC de adoptar acciones afirmativas de inclusión de la diversidad sexual en el actual proceso electoral, la cual es inexistente.......................................................................................................................... 7 1 Lesbianas, Gay, Bisexuales, Transexuales, Transgénero, Travestis, Intersexuales y Queer.

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

(Mexico) SM JDC 0167 2021

Judgment

Question Presented: Whether it was incorrect that the request for a citizen's trial that he filed in the initial instance was processed as a complaint, considering that this is the ideal way in which a favorable resolution could be obtained that guarantees the inclusion of members of the LGBTQIA+ community. Whether political parties are obligated to have a quota for candidates that identify as LGBTQIA+ to guarantee their inclusion in the political process.

Alleged Acts: The General Council of the Electoral Institute of Coahuila (IEC) held elections for 38 municipalities during the 2020-2021 electoral cycle. A local civil association submitted a consultation to the IEC regarding the affirmative actions that would be implemented in favor of people of sexual diversity and with disabilities to participate in the ongoing local electoral process. The IEC responded to the query and determined that it was not possible to implement the affirmative actions requested in the current process and urged the political parties to nominate candidates belonging to groups considered vulnerable. Appellant argues that although the IEC was able to exercise the regulatory power, it has as an electoral administrative authority to adopt this type of action. Even when the pre-campaign phase began, it did not issue guidelines to guarantee that the political-electoral rights of this disadvantaged or vulnerable group are exercised under conditions of equality and non-discrimination in the current local electoral process.

Procedural history: The local court issued a ruling in which, after accumulating the appeals, even though it declared the omission of affirmative action in favor of LGBTQIA+ candidates to exist, it considered that it was not appropriate to adopt the affirmative measures in the current electoral process and urged the political parties to nominate candidates of sexual diversity. Manuel Pacheco Martínez, head of the Secretariat of Sexual Diversity of the Executive Committee of the political party of MORENA in Coahuila, appealed the lower court’s decision to this Regional Chamber, contesting the omission of the IEC to implement actions that guarantee the inclusion of LGBTQIA+ and disabled people in the candidacy of candidacies to municipalities in the current electoral process

Summary: The grievance related to the improper re-channeling of citizen trial to complaint appeal is ineffective, since the lawsuit does not state the reasons why this route was not suitable for the analysis of the claimed omission and be in a position to obtain a favorable resolution that guarantees the inclusion of members of the LGBTQIA+ community. The court was not persuaded that the IEC failed to adopt affirmative actions to include sexual diversity in the electoral process. Plaintiff maintained that the local court should order the implementation of a quota as affirmative action to guarantee the inclusion of members of the LGBTQIA+ community, and not limit itself to urging political parties to nominate candidates of sexual diversity. However, such appeal does not directly contest the reasons given in the resolution being reviewed, since they are based on the initial approach of the omission attributed to the IEC, which is non-existent, because it issued a previous pronouncement on the refusal or inadmissibility of carrying it out in the current local electoral process.

Conclusion: The court upheld the lower court’s decision. The appeal did not state reasons why a complaint appeal was not appropriate. Furthermore, appellants did not demonstrate that the IEC failed to include LGBTQIA+ candidates in the electoral process.

Legal Issue(s)

Gender
Quotas

Applicable Law(s): Articles 1 & 4 of the Federal Constitution

Region: Americas

Country: Mexico

Language of Decision

Spanish

Court: Electoral Court

Election Type: Local

Date of decision: Mar 31, 2021

Geolocation

Latitude: 19.43318644

Longitude: -99.13401778

: Geolocation

Primary Documents

SM-JDC-0167-2021.pdf
Spanish
Download View