20 Official Gazette – Issue No. 9 (bis) March 1, 2015 As the plaintiff claims that the party-list system violates principles of equal opportunities and equality before the law and does not take into account the proportional weight of votes. Whereas the provisions included in Article (4) of HoR Law, and the in ability of Articles (2) and (3) of Law 202/ 2014 referred to herein– in area of application on election system with lists –and the attached table regarding constituencies of, has chosen for election with lists system to divide the Arab Republic of Egypt into four (4) constituencies, two of them were allocated (45) seats each, the first of which consists of the sector of Cairo, South and Central Delta, which comprises (6) governorates, including 21,280,268 voters and its population is 31,826,460 citizens, and the second is the constituency of the sector of North, Central and South Upper Egypt which consists of (11) governorates, and has 19,715,314 voters and 33,321, 638 citizens. the legislator allocated for the other two constituencies (15) seats each, the first of which is the sector East of Delta (7) governorates, that has 6,729,018 voters and its population is 10,747,074 citizens, and the second is the sector of West Delta (3) governorates, that has 7,309,449 voters and its population is 10,918,551 citizens, Also the second paragraph of Article (4) of house of representatives law referred to, stated that the number of members elected for each constituency is to be in proportion of its population and voters, to take into account the equitable representation for population and governorates and equivalent for voters, it leads to that the preceded regulation has committed with the constitutional controls for dividing the constituencies and distribution of seats between them, and does not violate principles of justice, equality and equal opportunity, also does not contravene with any other provision in the constitution, that requires dismiss that part of the case. Whereas claiming that Article (10) of House of Representatives law is in violation with the constitution provisions, as it contained obligation on the candidate to submit statement includes the biography of the candidate specially his/her scientific and practical experience, Article (18) of the current constitution states that "Citizen participation in the public life is a national duty, and each citizen has the right to vote and to be elected and give his/her opinion in the referendum, and the law regulates exercising these rights…..", and Article (102) states that "……and it is required for the applicant for membership of house of representatives (parliament), to be Egyptian and enjoys his/her civil and political rights, and has a certificate of completion of basic education,…..and the law indicates the conditions for applying for the elections', learned from above, and the judge of this court – that citizen has the right to vote and to be elected and give his opinion in the referendum in accordance with the provisions of law, and his/her contribution in the general life is a national duty, and the two preceded mentioned provision entrusted the legislator to regulate the right to be elected and to indicate its conditions, to ensure achieving targets aimed by the constitutional legislator in deciding it, and that obliges the legislator to put a regulation based on objective foundations providing equal opportunities for the candidates, excretion for their superiors, and that is to ensure citizens' right to choose their representatives in parliaments, as the legitimate authority is imposed only by the voters, and these two rights (nomination and voting) are compulsory needed to activate democracy in its content that decided constitutionally, and to ensure that the parliaments are in fact revealing the people's will, and consequently may not to entrust this representation to whom are not performing correctly, so that not to be burden on