more precisely from total 25 political subjects competing on these elections, the form had only 24 sections, lack of content which according to the submitters of the complainants impacts directly in the final result of each competitor on this competition. The submitter of the complaints added that in case the form in question is carefully watched ( FRP), there is no respective section line for the first certified subject for participation in the elections “ Liberal Egyptian Party” (PLE) with number 111, therefore they had to start with the prescription of the results of this party in the second column which was foreseen for the political subject “ Democratic Party of Kosovo” (PDK) with number 112 thus this caused confusion to the members e VCC, counters and result recorders and distortion of the result in voting centers all over Kosovo. This mistake made by CEC, according to the complaining subjects, has caused deep distrust to the results of political parties due to possible mistakes, intentional or not, made at the voting centers, during the description of the results so the votes for a Political Subject of Minorities FRP were not marked at all thus causing an additional confusion especially when dealing the counting of the votes for the candidates and the final result of these elections because in the meantime that there is no vote marked to the political subject, the candidates of the same subject might have votes marked in the Candidates result form and automatically there is a dilemma how come that the political subject has no vote while its candidates do. Political subject Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK) claims that as the consequence of this mistake there were at about 2500 voting centers and about 165 thousand votes of this political subject were marked to the other subject next to it -to Ashkali Party for Integration (PAL). At the end they mentioned that this mistake fluctuated the trust of citizens and political parties in the electoral process, it has violated heavily the integrity of electoral process in Republic of Kosovo as it made the results from the electoral process incredible too so there was a violation of legal provisions of LGE and Election rules of CEC so they asked from ECAP to suspend the counting process and order CEC to recount ballots throughout Kosovo. In order to support their allegations, the complaints submitters have attached some result forms (FRP) to their complaints, the printed forms which were used at the voting process in the capacity of material evidence. Panel, upon preliminary examination of the impermissible of the complaints, found that Complaints are impermissible Panel, preliminary assessed that the complaints A.no.350/2019, A.no.351/2019 and A.no.353/2019 all three dated on 07.10.2019 are the same in content, in the irregularity nature as alleged and the same were submitted against Central Election Panel (CEP) so Panel, based on Article 8 paragraph 3 of Rules and Procedures no.02/2015 of ECAP which provides that ” in order to facilitate the examination of complaints, the Chairperson of the decision-making panel may decide to join the complaints containing similar issues and that those complaints will be dealt with by a single decision”, decided to join the complaints and decided on the same with a single decision, as in the enacting clause of this decision. Panel, when deciding, did not evaluate the complainants’ allegations of alleged violations concerning the alleged violations as in the abovementioned complaints concerning that the CE had sent election material which contained technical mistakes in Forms of Compliance of Results at the voting centers for Early Elections for Assembly of Republic of Kosovo dated on 06.10.2019 due to the fact that the alleged violations by complaining subjects as per the complainants have impacted the electoral results published so far. Because the complainants’ main request was recounting due to allegations that technical mistakes

Select target paragraph3