Official Gazette – Issue No. 8 bis (a) May 26, 2013
9
Sixth: clause 7 of article (10) stipulates HEC's jurisdiction to set the rules on the
distribution of the available time - particularly in the prime time - for TV and radio
broadcast for electoral campaigning in the state and private media on absolutely equal
basis.
Whereas what is stated in the presented text on obliging private media to apply
absolute equality in the electoral campaigning of all candidates contradicts the text of
articles (45) and (48) of the constitution on ensuring the freedom of thought and
opinion, freedom of press, publication and all mass media, since such entities are
owned by persons of divergent ideological orientations, thus they may not be obliged
to allocate equal times to show candidates' platforms which contradict with their
orientations. This is not affected by the challenge that this obligation shall achieve
equality among candidates; since ensuring such equality is the duty of the state and its
formal media bodies according to articles (6), (8), (33) and (55) of the constitution.
Seventh: clause 8 of article 10 vested HEC with announcing election and referendum
general results.
Whereas article (228) of the constitution stipulates that "The High Elections
Commission, existing at the time the Constitution comes into effect, shall undertake
full supervision of the first parliamentary elections", the entrustment of referendum
general result to HEC stipulated in the aforementioned clause 8 infringes article (228)
of the constitution. The same defect applies to paragraph 1 of article (33), the end of
article (37), article (45), paragraph 1 of article (46) and (47) of the presented draft
law.
Eighth: paragraph 4 of article (12) of the draft law stipulates that "If the court – prior
to the start of the polls – rules that the name of the candidate be expunged, the voting
process shall proceed after excluding the candidate whose name was expunged.
However, if the voting process starts before the court decides on the request, the
polling process shall proceed provided that HEC suspends the announcement of the
results of the elections in which the candidate in question is contesting in case he/she
has received sufficient votes that allow them to win or to enter into a run-off vote
against another candidate. In the event that the court rules that such candidate be
removed, the election shall be re-run with the other candidates.
Since the foregoing paragraph 4 omits facing the case in which the polling process
starts before the High Administrative Court issues a ruling on expunging the name of
a candidate, if the polling process does not result in his/her winning or entering into
the re-run, and he got a number of votes that would affect the elections result within
the constituency, so that if he/she is excluded from the candidates before the
beginning of the poll, such votes or most of them would be distributed among the
other candidates, affecting the result of who wins or stands for the re-run. Hence, such
omission resulted in the infringement of the constitutional rights included in article
(55) of the constitution as it affects the voter's right to choose and that is the essence
of the right to election.
Ninth: article (16) of the presented draft law stipulates that "Polling and vote
counting processes for the Egyptians living abroad shall start before the scheduled