28 LOUISIANA v. CALLAIS Opinion of the Court That brings us to the third significant post-Gingles development: this Court’s decision in Rucho. In that decision, we held that claims of partisan gerrymandering are not justiciable in federal court. See 588 U. S., at 704–710. The upshot of Rucho was that, as far as federal law is concerned, a state legislature may use partisan advantage as a factor in redistricting. And litigants cannot circumvent that rule by dressing their political-gerrymandering claims in racial garb. Imposing liability “based on the racial effects of a political gerrymander in a jurisdiction in which race and partisan preference are very closely correlated . . . would, if accepted, provide a convenient way for future litigants and lower courts to sidestep our holding in Rucho that partisangerrymandering claims are not justiciable in federal court.” Alexander, 602 U. S., at 21. “Instead of claiming that a State impermissibly set a target Republican-Democratic breakdown, a plaintiff could simply reverse-engineer the partisan data into racial data and argue that the State impermissibly set a particular [racial] target. Our decisions cannot be evaded with such ease.” Ibid. The fourth significant development since Gingles is the increased use and capabilities of computers in drawing districts and creating illustrative maps. With “modern computer technology” at the ready, §2 plaintiffs invariably invoke the assistance of experts who can generate thousands—or even millions—of maps. Allen, 599 U. S., at 23; see id., at 33, 36 (involving more than 2 million expertgenerated maps). Computer algorithms can “easily contro[l] for partisan preferences” and “other redistricting factors such as compactness and county splits.” Alexander, 602 U. S., at 25. With the advent of such technology, if it is possible to identify an alternative map that fully achieves all the State’s legitimate goals while producing “ ‘greater racial balance,’ ” then a §2 plaintiff can easily do so. Id., at 34–35 (quoting Cromartie II, 532 U. S., at 258).

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents