THE GEORGIAN LABOUR PARTY v. GEORGIA JUDGMENT 3 7. A hearing on the merits took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 4 September 2007 (Rule 59 § 3 of the Rules of Court). There appeared before the Court: (a) for the Government Mr D. TOMADZE, Agent, Mr G. CHALAGASHVILI, Chairman of the Central Electoral Commission, Mr A. ANASASHVILI, Legal Officer at the Central Electoral Commission; (b) for the applicant party Ms J. RINCEANU, Counsel, Mr SH. NATELASHVILI, Chairman of the Georgian Labour Party, Mr M. BEKOV, Mrs D. CHADADZE-POLLMAN, Advisers. The Court heard addresses by Mr D. Tomadze, Mr G. Chalagashvili, Mr A. Anasashvili and Ms J. Rinceanu. 8. The applicant party filed its claims for just satisfaction at the hearing. On 23 October 2007 the Government submitted their comments on those claims. 9. On 1 February 2008 the Court changed the composition of its Sections, but the present case was retained by the Former Second Section. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 10. The applicant party is a political party. A. The Rose Revolution 11. On 20 November 2003 the Central Electoral Commission (“the CEC”) announced the final results of the votes in the regularly scheduled parliamentary election of 2 November 2003, according to which seven parties had cleared the 7% legal threshold required by Article 105 § 6 of the Electoral Code (“the EC”, see paragraph 44 below). The opposition party, the Saakashvili-National Movement, took third place with 18.04% of the vote (giving them 32 seats in Parliament), followed by the applicant party with 12.04% of the vote (20 seats) and the United Democrats, a coalition led

Select target paragraph3